Friday, January 28, 2011

Preterism vs Futurism Debate


If you've ever wondered about the true fruits of Preterism, you've got to see this debate. The attitude of the Preterists present will be enough to convince you it is not an Apostolic point of view, nor does it enjoy the presence of the Spirit. But more than that, the scholarly, biblical presentation by David S. Norris will place the last nail on the coffin of the heresy of Preterism.

Preterism (Larry T. Smith)
(The destruction of Jerusalem in a.d. 70 was the promised coming of Jesus)

vs

Futurism (David S. Norris)
(Jesus did not come in a.d. 70 but will come in the future)

Set of 2 DVDs

$20.00


To order click in the button below:










1 comment:

Rocky2 said...

(Apostolic..Saw this web piece!)

70 AD Futurism !

Preterists claim that the "Antichrist" and the "great tribulation" were fulfilled during the 70 AD period.
If so, why do we find that the arrival of the Antichrist was still expected by writers who lived during and after 70 AD?
Polycarp (70-167) wrote that "He comes as the Judge of the living and the dead."
Justin Martyr (100-168) said that "[Antichrist] shall venture to do unlawful deeds on the earth against us the Christians...."
Irenaeus (140-202) wrote that the ten kings (Rev. 17)"shall give their kingdom to the beast, and put the church to flight."
It's not true that Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) "revived" futurism because it was never lost during the Middle Ages or prior to that period of time.
Bernard of Clairvaux (1090-1153) stated: "There remains only one thing - that the demon of noonday [Antichrist] should appear."
Roger Bacon (1214-1274) spoke of "future perils [for the Church] in the times of Antichrist...."
John Wycliffe (1320-1384) referred to "the hour of temptation, which is coming upon all the world, Rev. iii."
Martin Luther (1483-1546): "[The book of Revelation] is intended as a revelation of things that are to happen in the future...."
(Google or Yahoo "Famous Rapture Watchers" to see quotes from many Christian leaders throughout the Church Age which prove that they expected a future Antichrist and a future great tribulation.)
Preterists use Matt. 24:34 ("This generation will not pass....") to try to prove a 70 AD fulfillment of "Antichrist." Since many of them see "these" (Matt. 25:46) fulfilled in the future in Rev. 20, why can't they apply futurism as easily to Matt. 24:34? After all, the word "this" is the singular form of "these"!
Church history is fascinating, right?